Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-145
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-145
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 08 May 2020

Submitted as: research article | 08 May 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal AMT.

Evaluation of single-footprint AIRS CH4 Profile Retrieval Uncertainties Using Aircraft Profile Measurements

Susan S. Kulawik1, John R. Worden2, Vivienne H. Payne2, Dejian Fu2, Steve C. Wofsy3, Kathryn McKain4,5, Colm Sweeney4, Bruce C. Daube Jr.6, Alan Lipton7, Igor Polonsky7, Yuguang He7, Karen E. Cady-Pereira7, Edward J. Dlugokencky8, Daniel J. Jacob6, and Yi Yin9 Susan S. Kulawik et al.
  • 1BAER Institute, 625 2nd Street, Suite 209, Petaluma, CA, USA
  • 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA,USA
  • 3School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
  • 4National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 5University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 6Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
  • 7Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
  • 8NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 9California Institute of Technology, USA

Abstract. We evaluate the uncertainties of methane optimal estimation retrievals from single footprint thermal infrared observations from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). These retrievals are primarily sensitive to atmospheric methane in the mid-troposphere through the lower stratosphere (~2 to ~17 km). We compare to in situ observations made from aircraft during the Hiaper Pole to Pole Observations (HIPPO), the NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) campaigns, and from the NOAA ESRL aircraft network, between the surface and 5–13 km, across a range of years, latitudes between 60 S to 80 N, and over land and ocean. After a global, pressure dependent bias correction, we find that the land and ocean have similar biases and that the reported observation error (combined measurement and interference errors) of ~27  ppb is consistent with the standard deviation between aircraft and individual AIRS observations. A single measurement has measurement (noise related) uncertainty of ~17 ppb, a ~20 ppb uncertainty from radiative interferences (e.g. from water, temperature, etc.), and ~ 30 ppb due to smoothing error, which is partially removed when making comparisons to in situ measurements or models in a way that account for this regularization. We estimate a 16 ppb validation error because the aircraft typically did not measure methane at altitudes where the AIRS measurements have some sensitivity, e.g. the stratosphere. Daily averaged AIRS measurements of at least 9 observations over spatio-temporal domains of < 1 degree and 1 hour have a standard deviation of ~17 ppb versus aircraft, likely because the observation errors from temperature and water vapor (for example) are only partly reduced through averaging. Seasonal averages can reduce this ~17 ppb uncertainty further to ~10 ppb, as determined through comparison with NOAA aircraft, likely because uncertainties related to radiative effects of temperature and water vapor can be reduced when averaged over a season.

Susan S. Kulawik et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 09 Jul 2020)
Status: open (until 09 Jul 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Susan S. Kulawik et al.

Susan S. Kulawik et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 104 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
77 24 3 104 8 0 0
  • HTML: 77
  • PDF: 24
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 104
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 May 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 May 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 77 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 77 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 03 Jun 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper shows comparisons of a new methane product from the AIRS satellite to aircraft-based observations. We show that this AIRS methane product provides useful information to study seasonal and global methane trends of this important greenhouse gas.
This paper shows comparisons of a new methane product from the AIRS satellite to aircraft-based...
Citation