Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 07 Oct 2019

Submitted as: research article | 07 Oct 2019

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal AMT.

Towards standardized processing of eddy covariance flux measurements of carbonyl sulfide

Kukka-Maaria Kohonen1, Pasi Kolari1, Linda M. J. Kooijmans2, Huilin Chen3, Ulli Seibt4, Wu Sun4,5, and Ivan Mammarella1 Kukka-Maaria Kohonen et al.
  • 1Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Meteorology and Air Quality group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
  • 3Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  • 4Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • 5Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA

Abstract. Carbonyl sulfide (COS) flux measurements with the eddy covariance (EC) technique are growing in popularity with the recent development in using COS to estimate gross photosynthesis at the ecosystem scale. Flux data intercomparison would benefit from standardized protocols for COS flux data processing. In this study, we analyze how various data processing steps affect the final flux and provide a method for gap-filling COS fluxes. Different methods for determining the lag time between COS mixing ratio and the vertical wind velocity (w) resulted in a maximum of 12 % difference in the cumulative COS flux. Due to limited COS measurement precision, small COS fluxes (below approximately 3 pmol m−2 s−1) could not be detected when the lag time was determined from maximizing the covariance between COS and w. We recommend using a combination of COS and carbon dioxide (CO2) lag times in determining the COS flux, depending on the flux magnitude compared to the detection limit of each averaging period. Different high frequency spectral corrections had a maximum effect of 10 % on COS flux calculations and different detrending methods only 1.2 %. Relative total uncertainty was more than five times higher for low COS fluxes (absolute flux lower than 3 pmol m−2 s−1) than for low CO2 fluxes (lower than 1.5 μmol m−2 s−1), indicating a low signal-to-noise ratio of COS fluxes. Due to similarities in ecosystem COS and CO2 exchange, and the low signal-to-noise ratio of COS fluxes that is similar to methane, we recommend a combination of CO2 and methane flux processing protocols for COS EC fluxes.

Kukka-Maaria Kohonen et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

Kukka-Maaria Kohonen et al.

Kukka-Maaria Kohonen et al.


Total article views: 289 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
229 57 3 289 2 4
  • HTML: 229
  • PDF: 57
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 289
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Oct 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 164 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 162 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1



No saved metrics found.


No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 17 Feb 2020
Publications Copernicus