Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-169
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-169
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 21 May 2019

Research article | 21 May 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

The Impact of Neglecting Ice Phase on Cloud Optical Depth Retrievals from AERONET Cloud Mode Observations

Jonathan K. P. Shonk1, Jui-Yuan Christine Chiu2, Alexander Marshak3, David M. Giles3,4, Chiung-Huei Huang5, Gerald G. Mace6, Sally Benson6, Ilya Slutsker3,4, and Brent N. Holben3 Jonathan K. P. Shonk et al.
  • 1National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
  • 2Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
  • 3NASA/Goddard Space FlightCenter, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
  • 4Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland, USA
  • 5Center for Environmental Monitoring and Technology, National Central University, Taoyuan,Taiwan
  • 6Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, SaltLake City, Utah, USA

Abstract. Cloud optical depth remains a difficult variable to represent in climate models, and hence there is a need for high-quality observations of cloud optical depth from locations around the world. Such observations could be readily obtained from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) radiometers using a two-wavelength retrieval method. However, the method requires an assumption that all of the cloud in a profile is liquid, and this has the potential to introduce errors into long-term statistics of retrieved optical depth. Using a set of idealised cloud profiles, we find that the fractional error in retrieved optical depth is a linear function of the fraction of the optical depth that is due to the presence of ice cloud (“ice fraction”), with a magnitude of order 55 % to 70 % for clouds that are entirely ice. We derive a simple linear equation that could potentially be used as a correction at AERONET sites where ice fraction can be independently estimated.

The greatest contribution to error statistics arises from optically thick cloud that is either mostly or entirely ice. Using this linear equation, we estimate the magnitude of the error for a set of cloud profiles measured at five sites of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement programme. Instances of such clouds are not frequent, with less than 15 % of cloud profiles at each location showing an error of greater than 10. However, differences in the frequency of such clouds from one location to another affect the magnitude of the overall mean error, with sites dominated by deep tropical convection and thick frontal mixed-phase cloud showing greater errors than sites where deep clouds are less frequent. The mean optical depth error at the five locations spans the range 2.5 to 5.5, which we show to be small enough to allow calculation of top-of-atmosphere flux to within 10 %, and surface flux to about 15 %.

Jonathan K. P. Shonk et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 16 Jul 2019)
Status: open (until 16 Jul 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Jonathan K. P. Shonk et al.
Jonathan K. P. Shonk et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 212 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
162 48 2 212 2 3
  • HTML: 162
  • PDF: 48
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 212
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 141 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 141 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Jun 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Retrievals of cloud optical depth made using AERONET radiometers in “cloud mode” rely on the assumption that all cloud is liquid. The presence of ice cloud therefore introduces errors in the retrieved optical depth, which can be over 25 in optically thick ice clouds. However, such clouds are not frequent and the long-term mean optical depth error is about 5 for a sample of real clouds. A correction equation could improve the retrieval further, although this would require extra instrumentation.
Retrievals of cloud optical depth made using AERONET radiometers in “cloud mode” rely on the...
Citation