Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-155
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-155
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 04 Jun 2019

Research article | 04 Jun 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Shallow Cumuli Cover and Its Uncertainties from Ground-based Lidar-Radar Data and Sky Images

Erin A. Riley1, Jessica M. Kleiss1, Laura D. Riihimaki2,3, Charles N. Long2,3, Larry K. Berg4, and Evgueni Kassianov4 Erin A. Riley et al.
  • 1Environmental Studies, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR 97219, USA
  • 2Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • 3Global Monitoring Division, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
  • 4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA

Abstract. Cloud cover estimates of single-layer shallow cumuli obtained from narrow field-of-view (FOV) lidar-radar and wide-FOV Total Sky Imager (TSI) data are compared over an extended period (2000–2017 summers) at the established United States Atmospheric Radiation Measurement mid-continental Southern Great Plains site. We quantify the impacts of two factors on hourly and sub-hourly cloud cover estimates: 1) instrument-dependent cloud detection and data merging criteria, and 2) FOV configuration. Popular enhanced observations at this site combine the advantages of the ceilometer, micropulse lidar (MPL) and cloud radar in merged data products, and are used to calculate temporal cloud fractions (CF). Sky images provide the spatial fractional sky cover (FSC) within the visible sky dome. To assess the impact of the first factor on CF obtained from the merged data products, we consider two additional sub-periods (2000–2010 and 2011–2017 summers) that mark significant instrumentation and algorithmic advances in the cloud detection and data merging. We demonstrate that CF obtained from ceilometer data alone and FSC obtained from sky images provide the most similar and consistent cloud cover estimates: bias and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) are within 0.04 and 0.12, respectively. Whereas CF from merged MPL-ceilometer data provides the largest estimates of the mean cloud cover: about 0.12 (35 %) and 0.08 (24 %) greater than FSC for the first and second sub-periods, respectively. CF from merged ceilometer-MPL-radar data has the strongest sub-period dependence with a bias of 0.08 (24 %) compared to FSC for the first sub-period and shows no bias for the second sub-period. To quantify the FOV impact, a narrow-FOV FSC is derived from the TSI images. We demonstrate that FOV configuration does not modify the bias, but impacts the RMSD (0.1 hourly, 0.15 sub-hourly). In particular, the FOV impact is significant for sub-hourly observations, where 41 % of narrow- and wide-FOV FSC differ by more than 0.1. A new "quick-look" tool is introduced to visualize impacts of these two factors through integration of CF and FSC data with novel TSI-based images of the spatial variability in cloud cover.

Erin A. Riley et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 31 Jul 2019)
Status: open (until 31 Jul 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Erin A. Riley et al.
Data sets

TSI composite images merged cloud fraction product for shallow cumulus cases (tsiQLtable) J. Kleiss and E. Riley https://doi.org/10.5439/1523254

Erin A. Riley et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 105 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
81 24 0 105 0 0
  • HTML: 81
  • PDF: 24
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 105
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jun 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 95 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 95 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Jun 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection differences contribute to long-term bias in shallow cumuli cover estimates, whereas narrow field-of-view configurations impact measurement uncertainty as averaging time decreases. A new tool is introduced to visually assess both impacts on sub-hourly cloud cover estimates. Accurate shallow cumuli cover estimation is needed for model-observation comparisons, and studying cloud-surface interactions.
Discrepancies in hourly shallow cumuli cover estimates can be substantial. Instrument detection...
Citation