Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-340
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-340
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 11 Dec 2018

Research article | 11 Dec 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

An inter-comparison of total column-averaged nitrous oxide between ground-based FTIR TCCON and NDACC measurements at seven sites and comparisons with the GEOS-Chem model

Minqiang Zhou1, Bavo Langerock1, Kelley C. Wells2, Dylan B. Millet2, Corinne Vigouroux1, Mahesh Kumar Sha1, Christian Hermans1, Jean-Marc Metzger3, Rigel Kivi4, Pauli Heikkinen4, Dan Smale5, David F. Pollard5, Nicholas Jones6, Nicholas M. Deutscher6, Thomas Blumenstock7, Matthias Schneider7, Mathias Palm8, Justus Notholt8, James W. Hannigan9, and Martine De Mazière1 Minqiang Zhou et al.
  • 1Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium
  • 2Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
  • 3UMS 3365 – OSU Réunion, Université de La Réunion, Saint-Denis, Réunion, France
  • 4Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space and Earth Observation Centre, Sodankylä, Finland
  • 5National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Lauder, New Zealand
  • 6Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
  • 7Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 8Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • 9Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

Abstract. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an important greenhouse gas and it can also generate nitric oxide, which depletes ozone in the stratosphere. It is a common target species of ground-based FTIR near-infrared (TCCON) and mid-infrared (NDACC) measurements. Both TCCON and NDACC networks provide a long-term global distribution of atmospheric N2O mole fraction. In this study, the dry-air column averaged mole fraction of N2O (XN2O) from the TCCON and NDACC measurements are compared against each other at seven sites around the world (Ny-Ålesund, Sodankylä, Bremen, Izaña, Reunion Island, Wollongong, Lauder) in the time period of 2007–2017. The mean differences in XN2O between the TCCON and NDACC (NDACC-TCCON) at these sites are between −3.32 and 1.37ppb (−1.1–0.5%) with the standard deviations between 1.69 and 5.01ppb (0.5–1.6%), which are within the uncertainties of the two datasets. The NDACC N2O retrieval has good sensitivity throughout the troposphere and stratosphere, while the TCCON retrieval underestimates a deviation from the a priori in the troposphere and overestimates it in the stratosphere. As a result, the TCCON XN2O measurement is strongly affected by its a priori profile.

Trends and seasonal cycles of XN2O are derived from the TCCON and NDACC measurements and the nearby surface flask sample measurements, and compared with the results from GEOS-Chem model a priori and a posteriori simulations. The a posteriori N2O fluxes in the model are optimized based on surface N2O measurements with a 4D-Var inversion method. The XN2O trends from the GEOS-Chem a posteriori simulation are very close to those from the NDACC and the surface flask sample measurements (0.9–1.0ppb/year). The XN2O trends from the TCCON measurements are slightly lower (0.8–0.9ppb/year) due to the underestimation of the trend in TCCON a priori. The XN2O trends from the GEOS-Chem a priori simulation are about 1.25ppb/year, and our study confirms that the N2O fluxes from the a priori inventories are overestimated. The seasonal cycles of XN2O from the FTIR measurements and the model simulations are close to each other in the Northern Hemisphere with a maximum in August–October and a minimum in February–April. However, in the Southern Hemisphere, the modeled XN2O shows a minimum in February–April while the FTIR XN2O retrievals shows a minimum in August–October. By comparing the partial column averaged N2O from the model and NDACC for three vertical ranges (surface–8, 8–17, 17–50km), we find that the discrepancy in the XN2O seasonal cycle between the model simulations and the FTIR measurements in the Southern Hemisphere is mainly due to their stratospheric differences.

Minqiang Zhou et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 05 Feb 2019)
Status: open (until 05 Feb 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Minqiang Zhou et al.
Minqiang Zhou et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 217 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
170 44 3 217 2 1
  • HTML: 170
  • PDF: 44
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 217
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Dec 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Dec 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 134 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 134 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 22 Jan 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
N2O is an important atmospheric gas, which is observed by two ground-based FTIR networks (TCCON and NDACC).The difference between NDACC and TCCON XN2O measurements are discussed. It is found that the bias between two networks are within their combined uncertainties. However, TCCON measurements are affected by a priori profiles. In addition, the TCCON and NDACC N2O measurements are compared with the GEOS-Chem model simulations.
N2O is an important atmospheric gas, which is observed by two ground-based FTIR networks (TCCON...
Citation
Share