Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.248 IF 3.248
  • IF 5-year value: 3.650 IF 5-year 3.650
  • CiteScore value: 3.37 CiteScore 3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.253 SNIP 1.253
  • SJR value: 1.869 SJR 1.869
  • IPP value: 3.29 IPP 3.29
  • h5-index value: 47 h5-index 47
  • Scimago H index value: 60 Scimago H index 60
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-220
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 13 Sep 2018

Research article | 13 Sep 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Cloud geometry from oxygen-A band observations through an aircraft side window

Tobias Zinner1, Ulrich Schwarz1, Tobias Kölling1, Florian Ewald1, Evelyn Jäkel2, Bernhard Mayer1, and Manfred Wendisch2 Tobias Zinner et al.
  • 1Meteorologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
  • 2Leipziger Institut für Meteorologie, Universität Leipzig, Germany

Abstract. During the ACRIDICON-CHUVA aircraft campaign in September 2014 over the Amazon, among other topics aerosol effects on the development of cloud microphysical profiles during the burning season were studied. Hyperspectral remote sensing with the imaging spectrometer specMACS provided cloud microphysical information for sun-illuminated cloud sides. In order to derive profiles of phase or effective radius from cloud side observations vertical location information is indispensable. For this purpose, spectral measurements of cloud side reflected radiation in the oxygen-A absorption band collected by specMACS were used to determine absorption path length between cloud sides and the instrument aboard the aircraft. From these data horizontal distance and eventually vertical height were derived.

It is shown that, depending on aircraft altitude and sensor viewing direction, an unambiguous relationship of absorption and distance exists and can be used to retrieve cloud geometrical parameters. A comparison to distance and height information from stereo image analysis (using data of an independent camera) demonstrates the efficiency of the approach. Uncertainty estimates due to method, instrument and environmental factors are provided by the method. Main sources of uncertainty are unknown in-cloud absorption path contributions due to complex 3D geometry or unknown microphysical properties, variable surface albedo and aerosol distribution. A systematic difference of 3.8km between stereo and spectral method is found which can be attributed to 3D geometry effects not considered in the methods simplified cloud model. If this offset is considered, typical differences found are 1.6km for distance and 230m for vertical position at a tpyical distance around 20km between sensor and convective cloud elements of typically 1–10km horizontal and vertical extent.

Download & links
Tobias Zinner et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 08 Nov 2018)
Status: open (until 08 Nov 2018)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Tobias Zinner et al.
Tobias Zinner et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 188 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
154 31 3 188 2 2
  • HTML: 154
  • PDF: 31
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 188
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Sep 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 188 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 186 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 25 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share