Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.089 IF 3.089
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.700 IF 5-year
    3.700
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.59 CiteScore
    3.59
  • SNIP value: 1.273 SNIP 1.273
  • SJR value: 2.026 SJR 2.026
  • IPP value: 3.082 IPP 3.082
  • h5-index value: 45 h5-index 45
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-164
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
01 Jun 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Instrument Artifacts Lead to Uncertainties in Parameterizations of Cloud Condensation Nucleation
Jessica A. Mirrielees and Sarah D. Brooks Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Abstract. The concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) modulate cloud properties, rainfall location and intensity, and climate forcings. This work assesses uncertainties in CCN measurements and the apparent hygroscopicity parameter (κapp) which is widely used to represent CCN populations in climate models. CCN measurements require accurate operation of three instruments: the CCN instrument, the differential mobility analyzer (DMA), and the condensation particle counter (CPC). Assessment of DMA operation showed that varying the ratio of aerosol to sheath flow from 0.05 to 0.30 resulted in discrepancies between the κapp values calculated from CCN measurements and the literature value. Discrepancies were found to increase from effectively zero to 0.18 for sodium chloride, and from effectively zero to 0.08 for ammonium sulfate. The ratio of excess to sheath flow was also varied, which shifted the downstream aerosol distribution towards smaller particle diameters (for excess flow < sheath flow) or larger particle diameters (for excess flow > sheath flow) than predicted. For the CPC instrument, undercounting occurred at high concentrations, resulting in calculated κapp lower than the literature values. Lastly, undercounting by CCN instruments at high concentration was also assessed, taking the effect of supersaturation on counting efficiency into account. Under recommended operating conditions, the combined DMA, CPC, and CCN uncertainties in κapp are 1.1 % or less for 25 to 200 nm diameter aerosols.
Citation: Mirrielees, J. A. and Brooks, S. D.: Instrument Artifacts Lead to Uncertainties in Parameterizations of Cloud Condensation Nucleation, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-164, in review, 2018.
Jessica A. Mirrielees and Sarah D. Brooks
Jessica A. Mirrielees and Sarah D. Brooks
Jessica A. Mirrielees and Sarah D. Brooks

Viewed

Total article views: 186 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
158 24 4 186 5 1 3

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jun 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 186 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 183 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 19 Jun 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Particles in the air, called aerosols, can participate in cloud formation and affect cloud properties. One way to study these particles is by determining their ability to uptake water, called hygroscopicity. Apparent hygroscopicity is one such measurement. This study evaluates how errors can arise in determining apparent hygroscopicity, and how to avoid or minimize them when collecting data.
Particles in the air, called aerosols, can participate in cloud formation and affect cloud...
Share