Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.089 IF 3.089
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.700 IF 5-year
    3.700
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.59 CiteScore
    3.59
  • SNIP value: 1.273 SNIP 1.273
  • SJR value: 2.026 SJR 2.026
  • IPP value: 3.082 IPP 3.082
  • h5-index value: 45 h5-index 45
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-181
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
13 Jul 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
A more representative “best representative value” for daily total column ozone reporting
Andrew R. D. Smedley, John S. Rimmer, and Ann R. Webb Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Abstract. Long-term trends of total column ozone, assessments of stratospheric ozone recovery and satellite validation are underpinned by a reliance on daily “best representative values” from Brewer spectrophotometers and other ground-based ozone instruments. In turn reporting of these daily total column ozone values to the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Centre has traditionally been predicated upon a binomial choice between direct sun and zenith sky observations. For mid- and high-latitude monitoring sites impacted by cloud cover we discuss the potential deficiencies of this approach in terms of its rejection of otherwise valid observations and capability to evenly sample throughout the day. A new methodology is proposed that makes full use of all valid direct sun and zenith sky observations, accounting for unevenly spaced observations and their relative uncertainty, to calculate an improved estimate of the daily mean total column ozone. It is demonstrated that this method can increase the number of contributing observations by a factor of 2.5, increases the sampled time span, and reduces the spread of the representative time by half. No effect on longer-term trends is detected, though for the sample data analysed we observe a mean increase of 2.8 DU (0.82 %) w.r.t. the traditional direct sun vs zenith sky average choice. To complement the new calculation of a best representative value of total column ozone and separate its uncertainty from the spread of observations, we also propose reporting its standard error rather than the standard deviation, together with measures of the full range of values observed.

Citation: Smedley, A. R. D., Rimmer, J. S., and Webb, A. R.: A more representative “best representative value” for daily total column ozone reporting, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-181, in review, 2017.
Andrew R. D. Smedley et al.
Andrew R. D. Smedley et al.

Data sets

UK ozone and UV monitoring site no. 352
A. R. D. Smedley, J. S. Rimmer, and A. R. Webb
https://doi.org/10.17616/R32C87
Andrew R. D. Smedley et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
101 39 2 142 1 5

Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 142 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 140 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 18 Aug 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share