Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-4011-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-4011-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 22 Apr 2015

Submitted as: research article | 22 Apr 2015

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Application of bias correction methods to improve the accuracy of quantitative radar rainfall in Korea

J.-K. Lee1, J.-H. Kim2, and M.-K. Suk2 J.-K. Lee et al.
  • 1Innovation Center for Engineering Education, Daejin University, Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
  • 2Weather Radar Center, Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul, Korea

Abstract. There are many potential sources of bias in the radar rainfall estimation process. This study classified the biases from the rainfall estimation process into the reflectivity measurement bias and QPE model bias and also conducted the bias correction methods to improve the accuracy of the Radar-AWS Rainrate (RAR) calculation system operated by the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). For the Z bias correction, this study utilized the bias correction algorithm for the reflectivity. The concept of this algorithm is that the reflectivity of target single-pol radars is corrected based on the reference dual-pol radar corrected in the hardware and software bias. This study, and then, dealt with two post-process methods, the Mean Field Bias Correction (MFBC) method and the Local Gauge Correction method (LGC), to correct rainfall-bias. The Z bias and rainfall-bias correction methods were applied to the RAR system. The accuracy of the RAR system improved after correcting Z bias. For rainfall types, although the accuracy of Changma front and local torrential cases was slightly improved without the Z bias correction, especially, the accuracy of typhoon cases got worse than existing results. As a result of the rainfall-bias correction, the accuracy of the RAR system performed Z bias_LGC was especially superior to the MFBC method because the different rainfall biases were applied to each grid rainfall amount in the LGC method. For rainfall types, Results of the Z bias_LGC showed that rainfall estimates for all types was more accurate than only the Z bias and, especially, outcomes in typhoon cases was vastly superior to the others.

J.-K. Lee et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J.-K. Lee et al.
J.-K. Lee et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 809 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
494 264 51 809 41 41
  • HTML: 494
  • PDF: 264
  • XML: 51
  • Total: 809
  • BibTeX: 41
  • EndNote: 41
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2015)
Cited  
Saved  
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 11 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper focuses on correcting the reflectivity measurement bias and the QPE model bias. For the reflectivity bias correction, the bias correction algorithm which corrected target radars in the hardware and software bias based on the standard radar was utilized. The Mean Field Bias Correction and the Local Gauge Correction methods were also applied to correct the QPE model bias. Proposed bias correction methods are able to contribute to the real-time QPE model in work-site operation.
This paper focuses on correcting the reflectivity measurement bias and the QPE model bias. For...
Citation