Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.400 IF 3.400
  • IF 5-year value: 3.841 IF 5-year
    3.841
  • CiteScore value: 3.71 CiteScore
    3.71
  • SNIP value: 1.472 SNIP 1.472
  • IPP value: 3.57 IPP 3.57
  • SJR value: 1.770 SJR 1.770
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 70 Scimago H
    index 70
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-293-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-293-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 15 Jan 2014

Submitted as: research article | 15 Jan 2014

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Interference of sulphur dioxide to balloon-borne ECC ozone sensors over the Valley of Mexico

I. Kanda1, R. Basaldud2, N. Horikoshi3, Y. Okazaki1, S. E. Benítez Garcia1, A. Ortínez2, V. R. Ramos Benítez4, B. Cárdenas2, and S. Wakamatsu1 I. Kanda et al.
  • 1Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
  • 2Mexico National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change (INECC), DF, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 3Meteoric Research Inc., Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Mexico National Weather Service (SMN), DF, Mexico

Abstract. Abnormal decrease in the ozonesonde sensor signal occurred during air-pollution study campaigns in November 2011 and March 2012 in Mexico City. Sharp drops around 5 km a.s.l. and above were observed in November 2011, and a broad deficit in the convective boundary layer in March 2012. Various circumstantial evidence indicates that the decrease was due to interference of SO2 gas to Electrochemical Concentration Cell (ECC) ozone sensors. The sharp drops in November 2011 are considered to be caused by the SO2 plume from the Popocatépetl volcano to the south-east of Mexico City. Response experiments of the ECC sensor to representative atmospheric trace gases showed that only SO2 could generate the observed abrupt drops. The vertical structure of the plume reproduced by a Lagrangian particle diffusion simulation also supported this assumption. The near-ground deficit in March 2012 is considered to be generated by the SO2 plume from the Tula industrial complex to the north-west of Mexico City. Sporadic large SO2 emission is known to occur from this region, and before and at the ozonesonde launching time, large intermittent peaks of SO2 concentration were recorded at the ground-level monitoring stations. The difference between the O3 concentration obtained by ozonesonde and that by UV-based O3 monitor was consistent with the SO2 concentration measured by a UV-based monitor on the ground. The plume vertical profiles estimated by the Lagrangian particle diffusion simulation agreed fairly well with the observed profile. Statistical analysis of the wind field in Mexico City revealed that the Popocatépetl effect is most likely to occur from June to October, and the Tula effect all the year.

I. Kanda et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
I. Kanda et al.
I. Kanda et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 962 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
549 312 101 962 55 51
  • HTML: 549
  • PDF: 312
  • XML: 101
  • Total: 962
  • BibTeX: 55
  • EndNote: 51
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Jan 2014)
Cited  
Saved  
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation