Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 2.989 IF 2.989
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.489 IF 5-year
    3.489
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.37 CiteScore
    3.37
  • SNIP value: 1.273 SNIP 1.273
  • SJR value: 2.026 SJR 2.026
  • IPP value: 3.082 IPP 3.082
  • h5-index value: 45 h5-index 45
doi:10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
03 Aug 2012
Review status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT). The revised manuscript was not accepted.
Resolution of an important discrepancy between remote and in-situ measurements of tropospheric BrO during Antarctic enhancements
H. K. Roscoe1, N. Brough1, A. E. Jones1, F. Wittrock2, A. Richter2, M. Van Roozendael3, and F. Hendrick3 1British Antarctic Survey, CB3 0ET Cambridge, UK
2IUPP, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
3BIRA, 3 Ave Circulaire, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
Abstract. Tropospheric BrO was measured by a ground-based remote-sensing spectrometer at Halley in Antarctica, and BrO was measured by remote-sensing spectrometers in space using similar spectral regions and Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) analyses. Near-surface BrO was simultaneously measured at Halley by Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (CIMS), and in an earlier year near-surface BrO was measured at Halley over a long path by a DOAS spectrometer. During enhancement episodes, total amounts of tropospheric BrO from the ground-based remote-sensor were similar to those from space, but if we assume that the BrO was confined to the boundary layer they were very much larger than values measured by either near-surface technique. This large apparent discrepancy can be resolved if substantial amounts of BrO were in the free troposphere during most enhancement episodes. Amounts observed by the ground-based remote sensor at different elevation angles, and their formal inversions to vertical profiles, also show that much of the BrO was often in the free troposphere. This is consistent with the ~5 day lifetime of Bry, from the enhanced BrO observed during some Antarctic blizzards, and from aircraft measurements of BrO well above the surface in the Arctic.

Citation: Roscoe, H. K., Brough, N., Jones, A. E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Van Roozendael, M., and Hendrick, F.: Resolution of an important discrepancy between remote and in-situ measurements of tropospheric BrO during Antarctic enhancements, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 5, 5419-5448, doi:10.5194/amtd-5-5419-2012, 2012.
H. K. Roscoe et al.
H. K. Roscoe et al.
H. K. Roscoe et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 729 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
402 280 47 729 37 27

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 26 May 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share