Volumes and Issues  Contents of Issue 1  
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 3, 675-695, 2010
www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/675/2010/
doi:10.5194/amtd-3-675-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


Comparison of one- and two-filter detectors for atmospheric 222Rn measurements

Y. Xia1, H. Sartorius2, C. Schlosser2, U. Stöhlker2, F. Conen1, and W. Zahorowski3
1Institute of Environmental Geosciences, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 30, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
2Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Willy-Brandt-Str. 5, 38226 Salzgitter, Germany
3Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia

Abstract. Parallel monitoring of 222Rn and its short-lived progeny (218Po and 214Pb) were carried out from November 2007 to April 2008 close to the top of the Schauinsland mountain, partly covered with forest, in South-West Germany. Samples were aspired from the same location at 2.5 m above ground level. We measured 222Rn with a dual flow loop, two-filter detector and its short-lived progeny with a one-filter detector. A reference sector for events, facing a steep valley and dominated by pasture, was used to minimize differences between 222Rn and progeny-derived 222Rn activity concentrations. In the two major wind sectors covered by forest to a distance between 60 m and 80 m towards the station progeny-derived 222Rn activity concentration was on average equal to 87% (without precipitation) and 74% (with precipitation) of 222Rn activity concentration.

Discussion Paper (PDF, 676 KB)   Interactive Discussion (Closed, 3 Comments)   Final Revised Paper (AMT)   

Citation: Xia, Y., Sartorius, H., Schlosser, C., Stöhlker, U., Conen, F., and Zahorowski, W.: Comparison of one- and two-filter detectors for atmospheric 222Rn measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 3, 675-695, doi:10.5194/amtd-3-675-2010, 2010.   Bibtex   EndNote   Reference Manager    XML