<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/inc/amtd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<eissn>1867-8610</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/amtd-3-3907-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3907/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3907/2010/amtd-3-3907-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3907/2010/amtd-3-3907-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3907</start_page>
	<end_page>3924</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-08-30</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Ceilometer-lidar inter-comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and  signal-to-noise ratio determination</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. Heese</name>
			<email>birgit.heese@tropos.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>H. Flentje</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Althausen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Ansmann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>S. Frey</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Leibniz-Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">German Meteorological Service, Meteorological Observatory  Hohenpeissenberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">JENOPTIK, ESW GmbH, Jena, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The potential of a new generation of ceilometer
instruments for aerosol monitoring has been studied in the
Ceilometer-Lidar Inter- Comparison (CLIC) study. The ceilometer is
of type CHM15k from Jenoptik, Germany, which uses a solid state
laser at the wavelength of 1064 nm and an avalanche photodiode for
photon counting detection. The German Meteorological Service is in
progress of setting up a ceilometer network for aerosol monitoring
in Germany. The intercomparison study was performed to determine
whether the ceilometers are capable to deliver quality assured
particle backscatter coefficient profiles. For this, the derived
ceilometer profiles were compared to simultaneously measured lidar
profiles at the same wavelength. The lidar used for this
intercomparison was IfTs multi-wavelengths Raman lidar Polly&lt;sup&gt;&lt;i&gt;XT&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;.
During the EARLINET lidar intercomparison campaign EARLI 09 in
Leipzig, Germany, a new type of the Jenoptik ceilometer, the
CHM15k-X, took part. This new ceilometer has a new optical setup
resulting in a complete overlap at 150 m. The derived particle
backscatter profiles were compared to profiles derived from
Polly&lt;sup&gt;&lt;i&gt;XT&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;s measurements, too. The elastic daytime particle
backscatter profiles as well as the less noisy night-time Raman
particle backscatter profiles compare well with the ceilometers
profiles in atmospheric structures like aerosol layers or the
boundary layer top height. The calibration of the ceilometer
profiles by an independent measurement of the aerosol optical depth
(AOD) by a sun photometer is necessary to determine the correct
magnitude of the particle backscatter coefficient profiles. A
comprehensive signal-to-noise ratio study was carried out to
characterize the ceilometers signal performance with increasing
altitude.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Althausen, D., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Heese, B., Ansmann, A., MÃ¼ller, D., and Komppula, M.: Portable Raman Lidar Polly$^XT$ for Automated Profiling of Aerosol Backscatter, Extinction, and Depolarization, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2366â€“2378, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Ansmann, A., Riebesell M., and Weitkamp C.: Measurement of atmospheric aerosol extinction profiles with a Raman lidar, Opt. Lett., 15, 746â€“748, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Flentje, H., Heese, B., Reichardt, J., and Thomas, W.: Aerosol profiling using the ceilometer network of the German Meteorological Service, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 3, 3643â€“3673, doi:10.5194/amtd-3-3643-2010, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Frey, S., Poenitz K., Teschke G., and Wille H.: Detection of aerosol layers with ceilometers and the recognition of the mixed layer depth, presented at the International Symposium for the Advancement of Boundary Layer Remote Sensing (ISARS), 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Optics, 23, 652â€“653, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Klett, J. D.: Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns, Appl. Optics, 20, 211â€“220, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Markovicz, K. M., Flatau, P. J., Kardas, A. E., Remiszewskaj, J., Stelmaszcyk, K., and WÃ¶ste, L.: Ceilometer Retrieval of the Boundary Layer Vertical Aerosol Extinction Structure, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 928â€“944, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Martucci, G., Milroy, C., and O&apos; Dowd, C D.: Detection of Cloud-Base Height Using Jenoptik CHM15K and Vaisala CL31 Ceilometers, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 305­-318, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> McKendry, I. G., van der Kampa, D. Strawbridge, K. B., Christen, A., and Crawford, B.: Simultaneous observations of boundary-layer aerosol layers with CL31 ceilometer and 1064/532~nm lidar, Atmos. Env., 43, 5847-5852, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> MÃ¼ller, D., Ansmann, A., Mattis, I., Tesche, M., Wandinger, U., Althausen, D., and Pisani, G.: Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16202, doi:10.1029/2006JD008292, 2007. \clearpage </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> SundstrÃ¶m, A.-M., Nousiainen, T., and PetÃ¤jÃ¤, T.: On the Quantitative Low-Level Aerosol Measurements Using Ceilometer-Type Lidar, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2340â€“2352, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Papparlardo, G., Freudenthaler, V., Mattis, I., et al.: Dispersion and evolution of the EyjafjallajÃ¶kull ash plume over Europe: vertically resolved measurements with the European LIDAR network EARLINET, EGU General Assembly, Vienna, 3â€“7~May~2010. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

