<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/inc/amtd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<eissn>1867-8610</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/amtd-3-3425-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3425/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3425/2010/amtd-3-3425-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-meas-tech-discuss.net/3/3425/2010/amtd-3-3425-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3425</start_page>
	<end_page>3453</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-08-17</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Evaluating the assumptions of surface reflectance and aerosol type selection within the MODIS aerosol retrieval over land: the problem of dust type selection</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Mielonen</name>
			<email>tero.mielonen@fmi.fi</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2,3">
			<name>R. C. Levy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="4">
			<name>V. Aaltonen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Komppula</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4,5">
			<name>G. de Leeuw</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Huttunen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>H. Lihavainen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>P. Kolmonen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="1,6">
			<name>K. E. J. Lehtinen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Arola</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Finnish Meteorological Institute, Kuopio Unit, Kuopio, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Finnish Meteorological Institute, Climate Change, Helsinki, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Ångström exponent (AE)
      values derived with the MODIS retrieval algorithm over land
      (Collection 5) were compared with ground based sun photometer
      measurements in Europe, Asia, Africa, North America and South
      America.  In Finland (Jokioinen and Sodankylä)
      measurements were done with Precision Filter Radiometer (PFR),
      while in Estonia (Toravere), Italy (Ispra, Rome Tor Vergata),
      India (Kanpur), China (Xianghe), GSFC (USA), Mexico (Mexico
      City), Zambia (Mongu) and Brazil (Alta Floresta) Cimel
      (AERONET, level 2) measurements were used. Comparison results
      for AOD were generally good, although there seems to be room
      for improvement in the MODIS aerosol model selection,
      particularly how dust is taken into account. At all studied
      sites, the MODIS algorithm often selects the dust aerosol
      model even when dust does not seem to be present and the air
      masses are not coming from arid regions. This happens
      especially when AOD values are relatively small (&lt;0.3). The selection of the dust model reduces the correlation
      between ground based and MODIS AOD measurements in dust-free
      situations. Moreover, the current aerosol model selection
      scheme produces unphysical AE values. Our study suggests that
      the aerosol model combining is sensitive to the ratio of
      660 nm and 2130 nm surface reflectances
      (slope(660/2130)). Furthermore, the value of the slope in the
      algorithm is mainly dependent on the Normalized Difference
      Vegetation Index (NDVI). The current relationship of these two
      parameters in the algorithm is not supported by the surface
      albedo climatology derived from MODIS measurements. The use of
      a more physical relationship improves the AE retrieval at the
      studied sites. However, at some sites the AOD correspondence
      deteriorates when the new relationship is used.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Anderson,~T L., Charlson,~R J., Bellouin,~N., Boucher,~O., Chin,~M., Christopher,~S A., Haywood,~J., Kaufman,~Y J., Kinne,~S., Ogren,~J A., Remer,~R A., Takemura,~T., Tanre,~D., Torres,~O., Trepte,~C R., Wielicki,~B A., Winker,~D A., and Yu,~H.: An A-train strategy for quantifying direct climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 18, 1795–1809, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Carlund,~T., Landelius,~T., and Josefsson,~W.: Comparison and uncertainty of aerosol optical depth estimates derived from spectral and broadband measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol., 42, 1598–1610, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Drury,~E., Jacob,~D J., Wang,~J., Spurr,~R J D., and Chance,~K.: Improved algorithm for MODIS satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depths over western North America, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16204, doi:10.1029/2007JD009573, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M. D., Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J. Atmos. Sci., 59(3), 590–608, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Eck,~T., Holben,~B., Reid,~J., Dubovik,~O., Smirnov,~A., O&apos;Neill,~N., Slutsker,~I., Kinne,~S.: Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 31333–31349, 1999.  </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Holben,~B N., Eck,~T F., Slutsker,~I., Tanré,~D., Buis,~J P., Setzer,~A., Vermote,~E., Reagan,~J A., Kaufman,~Y J., Nakajima,~T., Lavenu,~F., Jankowiak,~I., and Smirnov,~A.: AERONET – a~federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Ichoku,~C., Chu,~D A., Mattoo,~S., Kaufman,~Y J., Remer,~L A., Tanré,~D., Slutsker,~I., and Holben,~B N.: A~spatio-temporal approach for global validation and analysis of MODIS aerosol products, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(12), 8006, doi:10.1029/2001GL013206, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Jethva,~H., Satheesh,~S K., and Srinivasan,~J.: Assessment of second-generation MODIS aerosol retrieval (Collection 005) at Kanpur, India, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19802, doi:10.1029/2007GL029647, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Jethva,~H., Satheesh,~S K., Srinivasan,~J., and Levy,~R C.: Improved retrieval of aerosol size-resolved properties from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer over India: role of Aerosol Model and Surface Reflectance, J. Geophys. Res., in press., 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Kaskaoutis,~D G., Kosmopoulos,~P., Kambezidis,~H D., and Nastos,~P T.: Aerosol climatology and discrimination of different types over Athens, Greece, based on MODIS data, Atmos. Environ., 41, 7315–7329, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Kaufman,~Y J., Wald,~A E., Remer,~L A., Gao,~B C., Li,~R R., and Flynn,~L.: The MODIS 2.1 μm channel – correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 35, 1286–1298, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Kim,~S.-W., Yoon,~S.-C., Dutton,~E G., Kim,~J., Wehrli,~C., and Holben,~B N.: Global surface-based sun photometer network for long-term observations of column aerosol optical properties: intercomparison of aerosol optical depth, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42(1), 1–9, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Levy,~R C., Remer,~L A., Mattoo,~S., Vermote,~E F., and Kaufman,~Y J.: Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer spectral reflectance, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13211, 2007a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Levy,~R C., Remer,~L A., and Dubovik,~O.: Global aerosol optical properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol retrieval over land, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13210, doi:10.1029/2006JD007815, 2007b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Levy,~R C., Remer,~L A., Kleidman,~R G., Mattoo,~S., Ichoku,~C., Kahn,~R., and Eck,~T F.: Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 14815–14873, \doi10.5194/acpd-10-14815-2010, 2010. %%%%ok  </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Liu,~J., Schaaf,~C., Strahler,~A., Jiao,~Z., Shuai,~Y., Zhang,~Q., Roman,~M., Augustine,~J A., and Dutton,~E G.: Validation of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) albedo retrieval algorithm: dependence of albedo on solar zenith angle, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D01106, doi:10.1029/2008JD009969, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Liu,~L. and Mishchenko,~M I.: Toward unified satellite climatology of aerosol properties: direct comparisons of advanced level 2 aerosol products, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 109, 2376–2385, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Mi,~W., Li,~Z., Xia,~X., Holben,~B., Levy,~R., Zhao,~F., Chen,~H., and Cribb,~M.: Evaluation of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol products at two Aerosol Robotic Network stations in China, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22S08, doi:10.1029/2007JD008474, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Mishchenko,~M I., Liu,~L., Travis,~L D., Cairns,~B., and Lacis,~A A.: Toward unified satellite climatology of aerosol properties: 3. MODIS versus MISR versus AERONET, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 111, 540–552, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Mishchenko,~M I., Geogdzhayev,~I V., Liu,~L., Lacis,~A A., Cairns,~B., and Travis,~L D.: Toward unified satellite climatology of aerosol properties: what do fully compatible MODIS and MISR aerosol pixels tell us? J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 402–408, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Mishchenko,~M I., Geogdzhayev,~I V., Cairns,~B., Carlson,~B E., Chowdhary,~J., Lacis,~A A., Liu,~L., Rossow,~W B., and Travis,~L D.: Past, present, and future of global aerosol climatologies derived from satellite observations: a~perspective, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Rad., 106, 325–347, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Misra,~A., Jayaraman,~A., and Ganguly,~D.: Validation of MODIS derived aerosol optical depth over Western India, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04203, doi:10.1029/2007JD009075, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Moody,~E G., King,~M D., Schaaf,~C B., and Platnick,~S.: MODIS-Derived spatially complete surface albedo products: spatial and temporal pixel distribution and zonal averages, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 472879–472894, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Moody,~E G., King,~M D., Platnick,~S., Schaaf,~C B., and Gao,~F.: Spatially complete global spectral surface albedos: value-added datasets derived from Terra MODIS land products, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 43, 144–158, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Oo,~M M., Jerg,~M., Hernandez,~E., Picon,~A., Gross,~B M., Moshary,~F., and Ahmed,~S A.: Improved MODIS aerosol retrieval using modified VIS/SWIR surface albedo ratio over urban scenes, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 48(3), 983–1000, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Papadimas,~C D., Hatzianastassiou,~N., Mihalopoulos,~N., Kanakidou,~M., Katsoulis,~B D., and Vardavas,~I.: Assessment of the MODIS Collections C005 and C004 aerosol optical depth products over the Mediterranean basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2987–2999, \doi10.5194/acp-9-2987-2009, 2009. %%%ok  </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Remer,~L A., Kleidman,~R G., Levy,~R C., Kaufman~Y J., Tanré~D., Mattoo,~S., Martins,~J V., Ichoku,~C., Koren,~I., Yu,~H., and Holben~B N.: Global aerosol climatology from the MODIS satellite sensors, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14S07, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Schaepman-Strub,~G., Schaepman,~M E., Painter,~T H., Dangel,~S., and Martonchik,~J V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing – definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103, 27–42, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Schuster,~G L., Dubovik,~O., and Holben,~B N.: Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207, doi:10.1029/2005JD006328, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Smirnov,~A., Holben,~B N., Eck,~T F., Dubovik,~O., and Slutsker,~I.: Cloud-screening and quality control algorithms for AERONET database, Remote Sens. Environ., 73, 337–349, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Wehrli,~C.: Calibrations of filter radiometers for determination of atmospheric optical depth, Metrologia, 37, 419–422, 2000. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

